A comparison of sedation quality with midazolam-ketamine versus propofol-ketamine during Phacoemulsification surgery

Authors

  • Darush Moradi Farsani Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Hamidreza Shetabi Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Seyed Morteza Haidari Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  • Zahra Bechari Medical Student, Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract:

Background: Phacoemulsification surgery is one of the most common surgeries in the world. Various drugs have been used alone or in combination with each other to provide effective and safe sedation in patients, but so far, a drug method agreed upon by anesthesiologists has not been proposed. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the sedative quality of midazolam or propofol with a low dose of ketamine in phacoemulsification surgery. Methods: This study was a double-blind randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2017 to August 2019 at Faiz Hospital, Isfahan. In this study, 68 patients were assigned in the groups of midazolam (M) and propofol (P) using randomization software entered the study. The midazolam (M) group received 0.04 mg/kg and the propofol (P) group received 0.5 mg/kg, then in both groups, ketamine 0.3 mg/kg was injected intravenously. The quality of sedation, cardiovascular response and patient and surgeon satisfaction were assessed and recorded. Data were entered into SPSS 23 software and analyzed by using ANOVA and Independent samples t‐test. Results: In this study, between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics there was no significant difference (P>0.05). In the KM group, higher percentage of patients achieved the desired quality of sedation, but, between the two groups no statistically significant difference was shown (P=0.75). Surgeon satisfaction was higher in the KP group (P=0.18) and patient satisfaction was higher in the KM group (P=0.18) but there was no significant difference (P>0.05). Recovery time between groups was Similar and no statistically significant difference was shown (P>0.98). In the KM group at 5 minutes, systolic blood pressure (SBP) was notably greater than the other group (P=0.02) and diastolic blood pressure was notably greater than the KP group (P=0.08). Conclusion: It can be stated that adding a small dose of ketamine to propofol and midazolam is associated with effective sedation and a similar cardiovascular response during phacoemulsification surgery.  

Upgrade to premium to download articles

Sign up to access the full text

Already have an account?login

similar resources

Comparison between the effects of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl for sedation in cataract surgery

Background and Aim: Considering the importance of proper sedation in cataract surgery, this study was conducted to make a comparison between the effects of ketamine-propofol combination and fentanyl-propofol combination for sedation in phacoemulsification surgery. Methods: In this clinical trial study, 84 patients who were candidates for phacoemulsification cataract surgery were assigned to two...

full text

A comparison of sedation with midazolam–ketamine versus propofol–fentanyl during endoscopy in children: a randomized trial

PURPOSE We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of midazolam plus ketamine versus fentanyl plus propofol combination administered to children undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) and to determine the most appropriate sedation protocol. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective, randomized, single-blind study included patients between the ages of 4 and 17 years who underwent UGE ...

full text

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-Propofol Combination for Sedation in Cataract Surgery.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to compare the sedative properties and haemodynamic and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and a ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol), which are expected to have minimal effects on spontaneous breathing. METHODS Sixty patients were enrolled in this prospective randomised study. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the administration of dex...

full text

[Ketamine-propofol sedation in circumcision].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE to compare the therapeutic effects of ketamine alone or ketamine plus propofol on analgesia, sedation, recovery time, side effects in premedicated children with midazolam-ketamine-atropin who are prepared circumcision operation. METHODS 60 American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I-II children, aged between 3 and 9 years, undergoing circumcision operatio...

full text

Comparison of propofol/fentanyl versus ketamine/midazolam for brief orthopedic procedural sedation in a pediatric emergency department.

PURPOSE To compare the effectiveness of 2 medication regimens, propofol/fentanyl (P/F) and ketamine/midazolam (K/M), for brief orthopedic emergency department procedural sedation. This study was powered to compare recovery times (RT) and procedural distress as measured by the Observational Score of Behavioral Distress-revised (OSBD-r; range: 0-23.5 with 23.5 representing maximal distress). ME...

full text

Safety and Efficacy of Ketamine-dexmedetomidine versus Ketamine-propofol Combinations for Sedation in Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Prolonged mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery is associated with serious complications that increase morbidity and mortality. The present study was designed to compare ketamine-propofol (KP) and ketamine-dexmedetomidine (KD) combinations for sedation and analgesia in patients after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery as regards hemodynamics, total fentanyl d...

full text

My Resources

Save resource for easier access later

Save to my library Already added to my library

{@ msg_add @}


Journal title

volume 79  issue 1

pages  18- 25

publication date 2021-04

By following a journal you will be notified via email when a new issue of this journal is published.

Keywords

Hosted on Doprax cloud platform doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023